RE: Pro-life atheists
May 22, 2014 at 2:07 pm
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2014 at 2:10 pm by Losty.)
(May 22, 2014 at 1:53 pm)Heywood Wrote:I will hop right on over to her office and ask her to illegally share medical records of specific cases in order to prove this to you(May 22, 2014 at 12:38 pm)Losty Wrote: "When a pregnancy must be ended before a fetus is viable, the result is an abortion," says Vanessa Cullins, Vice President for External Medical Affairs for Planned Parenthood Federation of America. But she says there also are cases after viability in which an abortion is safer than an induced childbirth or surgical delivery.
Listen Heywood, I know you consider yourself an expert for whatever reason, but I do not value your professional opinion because it is not your profession and you have no idea what you're talking about.
Perhaps you can ask Vanessa Cullins to tell us what those cases are because until she does, all you done is cite an unsupported assertion.
.

Quote:(May 22, 2014 at 1:51 pm)Losty Wrote: As long as it doesn't risk the life of the mother or risk severe health problems to the mother then yes.
Then you should be against 99.99999999999999999999999% of all late term abortions. Instead you wish to give the mother the option to kill another human being she doesn't want to deal with.
Heywood, only 1% of abortions are late term abortions. Where I live it is illegal to have an abortion after 20 weeks unless you can either prove that the fetus is not viable or it is medically necessary. So I am against 0% of late term abortions where I live.