RE: Pro-life atheists
May 22, 2014 at 4:27 pm
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2014 at 4:33 pm by Mudhammam.)
(May 19, 2014 at 6:47 pm)Losty Wrote: How many children who have suffered unspeakable horrors and deaths at the hands of unloving parents could have been spared such pain and suffering if their mothers would have had abortions?
That seems like a fallacious, and dangerous, argument to make. What's the difference between that and asking: How many descendants of World War II's millions of victims might now be suffering? Maybe wars in general do future generations a favor by sparing so many a possibility of life? To suggest that abortion is preferable to adoption because the child MIGHT suffer by his adoptive parents seems similarly unjustified and potentially harmful as policy, personal or otherwise.
