Pro-life atheists
May 27, 2014 at 1:59 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 2:05 am by Rampant.A.I..)
(May 27, 2014 at 1:47 am)Chas Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 1:45 am)Heywood Wrote: You gave crappy reasons and made crappy arguments....and then you act surprised when I am unconvinced.
A zygote meets the definition of an organism. Therefore a human zygote is a human being. Its in your biology text book(well, your biology text was probably a clay tablet) [and yours is a colouring book] under life cycle of a human being. If you don't believe me....look it up.
No, a zygote does not meet the definition. An organism is independent.
A human being has a nervous system.
And is self aware, can feel pain, has wants, needs and desires.
(May 27, 2014 at 1:56 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 1:47 am)Chas Wrote: No, a zygote does not meet the definition. An organism is independent.
A human being has a nervous system.
Well then Chas, you are not an organism cause you are not independent. You rely on bacteria in your gut.
Now that's just stupid.
(May 27, 2014 at 1:56 am)Heywood Wrote: Anyways, I done rehashing this. You're just too incredulous.
*Anyway, *I'm
Quote:in·cred·u·lous
inˈkrejələs/
adjective
(of a person or their manner) unwilling or unable to believe something.
"an incredulous gasp"
synonyms: disbelieving, skeptical, unbelieving, distrustful, mistrustful, suspicious, doubtful, dubious, unconvinced
(May 27, 2014 at 1:35 am)Chas Wrote: You gave crappy reasons and made crappy arguments....and then you act surprised when I am unconvinced.
