(May 28, 2014 at 8:02 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27593504I understand the 'reasoning' goes like this:
1. If the woman's been kidnapped and forcibly married, she's lost the value that her virginity would have brought to the family therefore as spoiled goods, she can be killed
2. If the woman has married someone of her own free will without her family's consent then she's disrespected the family and over-stepped the boundaries of her role and authority therefore as a willful child, she can be killed.
Either way, she was right in the shit.
Sum ergo sum