(May 28, 2014 at 11:50 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 28, 2014 at 10:54 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: The question should be why the strongly Pro-Life religious have more abortions than pro-choice supporters.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_fact4.htm
http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/4051...-abortions
The fact that Christians have more or fewer abortions has no bearing on the morality of abortions.
(May 28, 2014 at 2:58 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Well ok, let me take a leaf from your book.
'Science' actually tends to agree with the pro-choice lobby regarding when the line is drawn where a human becomes a human. It's always going to be a blurred line, but we can rule out stages such as the zygote.
But seeing as you pretty much agree with me that you're not here for a discussion, I see no reason to further engage with you on this subject.
When text books start describing the human lifecycle beginning with a 24 week fetus, then your claim science supports your position might actually have some merit. Textbooks do support my position that the lifecycle of a human being includes the zygote.
It does when the proponents of that morality are complete and utter hypocrites.
Also, yes, you keep repeating that stages of human development in the womb are stages of human development.
This doesn't qualify fertilized eggs, blastocysts or zygotes as persons with rights.