Pro-life atheists

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Well ok, let me take a leaf from your book.

'Science' actually tends to agree with the pro-choice lobby regarding when the line is drawn where a human becomes a human. It's always going to be a blurred line, but we can rule out stages such as the zygote.

But seeing as you pretty much agree with me that you're not here for a discussion, I see no reason to further engage with you on this subject.

When text books start describing the human lifecycle beginning with a 24 week fetus, then your claim science supports your position might actually have some merit. Textbooks do support my position that the lifecycle of a human being includes the zygote.

Citation needed.

Also, 'textbooks' is a pretty odd way to categorise scientific discourse.

Regardless of what you do or don't post, you seem to be really struggling to grasp the nuances of the subject you are bulldozing through. It really irks me when I see people claiming 'truths' or 'facts' on a Subject they know really very little about.

Two gamete cells are human beings with rights?

More rights than the woman carrying them?

Gametes are not human beings. When two gametes fuse and become a zygote that is when a human being comes into existence.

Ha, look at this.

Remember what I said about not grasping nuances?

Upon what method have you drawn the seeming arbitrary line to draw your conclusion? Show your working and your citations.