(December 18, 2008 at 5:17 am)lukec Wrote: Yes, he is a bit silly and arrogant, but frankly with the amount of time he spends on here, I think a week ban would've been long enough. To be honest, I think that when it comes down to it, Daystar well represents what a lot of creationists are like- narrow-minded, set in their ways, and unwilling to compromise. But at least he was here, and at least he was talking. Maybe he did disagree with a lot of what was being said, but frankly even if only 1% of what was being said around here, cus there is a lot of good stuff, sank in, I'd be happy. And that's not going to happen over at his new "Pathway Machine." If it were up to me, I would've officially warned him twice in private, then banned him for a week. If when he came back, the behavior had not changed, the ban would be for a month. Then permanent. But as I am not in charge.... [grins evilly to self] ....yet... [/grin]... all I can say is that I oppose the permanent ban AND the month long.That's the problem though, it wouldn't have sank in because he was already 100% right!
He *knew* evolution was wrong and was unwilling to read anything that might give him some indication that it might not be as cut & dried as he thought.
