Evolution 'proved' wrong

[Esquilax]

Look, OP, this is really simple: the first image in the article you posted is a picture of Charles Darwin with a quote. Here:



Now, see, this immediately sets my blood boiling, because it's a quote mine. It's a lie.

Here's the full quote, in the first subsection, next to the misquote. Darwin was not saying that the eye could not possibly have evolved, he was saying that it seems ridiculous when only looking at the current, complex human eye and nothing else.

To me, that's the end of the conversation with regards to the factual accuracy of that article you posted. They lied to you almost immediately, and it's not like they could have missed the rest of the paragraph that quote was taken from.

They lied, because they are dishonest, and more interested in proving evolution wrong than in being factually correct. I stopped reading there, and frankly, so should you. Conmen won't teach you anything worth knowing.