Evidence God Exists: Part II

[Welsh cake]

Abiogenesis discredited. 500 years of experiments have failed to produce life out of inanimate matter.

It might be within your interest to read the article without personal bias - it said researchers had taken another fundamental step towards explaining the evolution of life by synthesizing the basic ingredients of RNA.

The fact that the University of Manchester has so far failed to synthesize these ribonucleotides does not mean abiogenesis is invalid, after all these results couldn't be reproduced and verified by a credible independent source or peer review.

The lack of evidence for abiogenesis is my evidence. And for those of you who start dismissing this as non-evidence, then you need to remember that what I'm presenting is a result of centuries of experiments by scientists. Therefore, it is evidence.

I'm starting to think you don't actually know what evidence is.

First off, as everyone else here already stated, disproving abiogenesis is not proof of a god. Go back and try again. For any argument you need to have confirmers, not defeaters to make existence claims, which you haven't yet provided. Whereas abiogenesis is a theory, your god concept barely qualifies as a hypothesis.

But the real tragedy is you're ignorantly trying to discredit or downgrade accomplishments in science which provided you with the very luxuries and technology you're using to communicate with right now.