I agree with the ban. I agreed with the month ban since he did break a number of rules, (almost every rule). When he produced another account and use it to mass spam, I then agreed that a permanent ban would be necessary.
If he had just waited for the ban to be lifted, he could come back and try again, but he ruined it for himself by breaking more rules, rules being slightly more serious.
I don't like seeing people being banned but it must be done. Who knows? If we allowed him back after what he had done, would he mass spam again? Would he post more insults and produce more accounts? Breaking more rules? It causes to much trouble and it makes the forum look bad.
If he had just waited for the ban to be lifted, he could come back and try again, but he ruined it for himself by breaking more rules, rules being slightly more serious.
I don't like seeing people being banned but it must be done. Who knows? If we allowed him back after what he had done, would he mass spam again? Would he post more insults and produce more accounts? Breaking more rules? It causes to much trouble and it makes the forum look bad.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
