Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 5, 2014 at 3:46 pm
(June 5, 2014 at 6:00 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:(June 5, 2014 at 5:49 am)Tonus Wrote: That's fairly hypocritical of you to say. This is not evidence of creation. It is evidence that science progresses because it is willing to challenge existing knowledge and understanding in light of new discoveries or even just in light of a new approach to a problem. If scientists had been unwilling to challenge the work of other scientists in this manner, they'd be practicing religion, not science.
Articles like the one you link are written because scientists learn enough to change or overthrow a theory, or because a scientist decides to challenge conventional thinking or theories. In the realm of science, that gets you published in a peer-reviewed journal and your work comes under scrutiny. In the realm of religion, that gets you killed and your work gets destroyed.
That's why you can't win with morons like ST here.
Science accepts a theory and it isn't challenged? Well, the theory is as dogmatic as any religious text!
Science challenges a theory with new or contradictory evidence (eg. The scientific method)? Well science is wrong and so if this one theory is wrong IT'S ALL WRONG!
Stupidity at its finest.
This right here.
http://vserver1.cscs.lsa.umich.edu/~crshalizi/White/
"Heretic! Kill him! Heretics, kill them! Too many heretics -- Change the dogma, this is all part of God's plan!"
