Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[snowtracks]

the moon is a necessity for advanced life on earth, yes necessity. when evidence of creation is confronted, this is one way to handle it. "Current theories on the formation of the Moon owe too much to cosmic coincidences, says Robin Canup. " http://www.nature.com/news/planetary-sci...es-1.14270

---

That's fairly hypocritical of you to say. This is not evidence of creation. It is evidence that science progresses because it is willing to challenge existing knowledge and understanding in light of new discoveries or even just in light of a new approach to a problem. If scientists had been unwilling to challenge the work of other scientists in this manner, they'd be practicing religion, not science.

---

Articles like the one you link are written because scientists learn enough to change or overthrow a theory, or because a scientist decides to challenge conventional thinking or theories. In the realm of science, that gets you published in a peer-reviewed journal and your work comes under scrutiny. In the realm of religion, that gets you killed and your work gets destroyed.

the point for the link is dr. canup 'cosmic coincidences' infers design, so there must be another explanation. that's how it handled.