RE: Evidence God Exists: Part II
May 2, 2010 at 2:42 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2010 at 2:48 pm by Paul the Human.)
Conclusively is not the issue. The issue is that there is evidence to support one side and none to support the other. You have tried to present evidence that god exists. Instead, you have provided evidence that if you believe god exists... then you believe god exists... despite, or even in spite of, the evidence (or lack thereof). Not knowing the answer does not make the answer god. Not having a scientific explanation does not mean there is not one.
I would like to add that a lack of evidence for the existence of god(s) does not mean that god(s) do not exist any more than the evidence to support a scientific conclusion means that conclusion is correct. But nothing you have presented to this point qualifies as "Evidence". That's what I'm trying to tell you.
I would like to add that a lack of evidence for the existence of god(s) does not mean that god(s) do not exist any more than the evidence to support a scientific conclusion means that conclusion is correct. But nothing you have presented to this point qualifies as "Evidence". That's what I'm trying to tell you.
