RE: Evidence God Exists: Part II
May 2, 2010 at 3:37 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2010 at 3:39 pm by Paul the Human.)
(May 2, 2010 at 3:25 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: I feel there's some bias in your reply. You say it's not evidence based on your belief, which is what you've said I'm doing.
It is not based on my belief. I'm not sure how to explain this any more clearly. Heheh. Evidence is something solid and concrete. Fossils are an example of evidence that indicates that evolution is the most likely scenario. It's not a matter of believing in fossils.
"Humans are the dominant species and can imagine there is a god" is not evidence by the scientific definition of the word. You say it points you to the conclusion that there is a god, but it points me to look at the physical, demonstrable evidence that suggests that we are a product of very successful evolution. The evidence actually suggests that god was not necessary at all. You are mistaking the definition of the word evidence.
(May 2, 2010 at 3:25 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: Off-topic: Been meaning to tell you, awesome avatar. Hilarious!
Thanks! I thought he was cool and disturbing at the same time.
Can anyone else explain this better than I am? Please.