(April 30, 2010 at 11:43 am)AngelThMan Wrote: Abiogenesis discredited. 500 years of experiments have failed to produce life out of inanimate matter. Scientists make excuse that the earth would have to be in the same condition as it was billions of years ago for life to be produced. And that’s just what it is. An excuse after so many experiments failed. So where does life comes from if there is no God? Evolution explains the development of life, or how it evolved from point A to point B. It doesn’t explain the origin. How life itself started. Scientists' many attempts recently to synthesize ribonucleotides have failed...
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/0...z0mbAXSyts
The lack of evidence for abiogenesis is my evidence.
Despite hundreds of years of experimentation, scientists have been unable to turn lead into gold. So where did gold come from if it was not spun out of straw by Rumpelstiltskin? The lack of evidence for turning lead into gold is my evidence. Obviously, Rumpelstiltskin made all the gold!
Now do you see how stupid your argument is?
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
