RE: All Hail the Second Amendment
June 11, 2014 at 2:43 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2014 at 3:30 pm by Chas.)
(June 11, 2014 at 11:57 am)Minimalist Wrote: I make no such argument.
But both parts of the problem need to be addressed.
And I don't, and never have, disagreed with that.
(June 11, 2014 at 11:59 am)Hoopington Wrote:(June 11, 2014 at 11:54 am)Chas Wrote: Well, no they don't. The military uses selective fire assault rifles like the M-16 and M-4.
I am responding to your statement that the problem is 'military grade' weapons can be bought over the counter.
Your military Chas.
Besides, what did the AR-15 become?..... you chose an incredibly bad example to indulge in your pedantic game of semantics.
My military? Which military is that?
Being correct is not the same as being pedantic.
![[Image: coffeedrinker.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.acbeddoe.com%2Fphotos%2Fpublic%2Fcoffeedrinker.gif)
There are other rifles with exactly the same capabilities as the AR-15 that are not military rifles, either.
The AR platform was designed by Armalite and sold to to Colt, who then sold a selective fire rifle to the military which designated it "M16A1".
Colt sold a semi-automatic rifle based on the AR design to the public, calling it "AR-15". So the AR-15 didn't 'become' anything.
So, what is it about the AR-15 that offends you?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.