(June 13, 2014 at 9:54 pm)professor Wrote: Poc, thanks for a reasonable post from yourself.
Whenever evidence does not agree with the story, something is wrong.
One thing you can do is "Follow the money". Or "Who benefits"?
In the case of the fake moon landing, it is the Defense contractors who worked for NASA and the politicians and bankers whose participation brought gain for themselves. Huge gains.
Gains that people kill for.
For 911, the ensuing war brought similar gains to the same type of people.
There are so many anomalies with the event that warrant investigation.
The system will absolutely not do it and anyone who does is detracted.
I ask, "Why this loyalty to the official line"?
You and I are the victimized part of the population, NOT the ones benefiting.
I could understand loyalty if you were raking in millions as a result of an event.
But that is not the case is it?
Personally, I enjoy reading about wild conspiracy theories. They are very good training for analytical thought. There are so many traps to logical sequencing that can lead one down the wrong path. I like them like some people like crosswords or Sudoku puzzles.
Like a magician that only shows the audience the misleading part of the illusion, some people use world events to spin stories that further their own agenda. Yet Sometimes conspiracy theorist are actually right! And almost invariably, time tells the tell. Secrets eventually get out.
In the moon landing, time is very telling. The engineers and astronauts that participated in the first landings did not die or disappear behind assumed names. They continued their work. The companies that participated then are still in business now and the technology used in those landings did not disappear, it was reused extensively and built upon to become the technology that we have today. Our cell phones with their microprocessors, gps, and positional sensors are evidence that those technologies had beginnings. Those beginnings were from these men in this program. These men had names and their companies were well known. The men and women in the space program continued to work week by week innovating and improving technology and it's use.
While it may be somewhat reasonable to argue that a particular event in the space program may not have occurred on a particular time or place when the evidence is questionable, but the evidence that technology builds upon itself and that tech companies and scientists use accomplishments as stepping stones cannot be in doubt.
We know, independent of other evidence, that the moon landing or something equally as technologically difficult, occurred in the late sixties and you are using the proof everyday, even as you type your replies.
Moon landing hoaxers never claim that it was really Apollo 12 that was the first as opposed to 11, no they claim that all of the technology is fake, which is totally laughable considering our technological word of today.
What particular technological challenge do you think was too insurmountable? The breathing apparatus? The rocket engine? The taste of tang?
Find the cure for Fundementia!