Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
June 16, 2014 at 4:38 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2014 at 4:43 am by Rampant.A.I..)
(June 15, 2014 at 12:49 am)snowtracks Wrote:(June 14, 2014 at 7:31 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Earth already had a much larger core, was already spinning and providing a magnetic field and all the shebangs... I guess you had forgotten your point, huh?so is the poster's statement "It also assumes an impact for which there is no evidence; the evidence points to a glancing blow not involving the cores.", true or false?
f word, cartoons, atheism all kinda goes together.
![[Image: vuru6ave.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F06%2F14%2Fvuru6ave.jpg)
(June 14, 2014 at 6:28 pm)snowtracks Wrote:(June 14, 2014 at 7:19 am)pocaracas Wrote: Snowtracks, here's what these people consider a reputable source:solarsystem.nasa.gov--- same conclusion.
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/scitech/disp...?ST_ID=446
and
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~planets/sstewart/Moon.html
Enjoy them.
The impactor now hits the Earth again (frame 9), but this time is incorporated into the Earth (frames 10-12). Its metallic core becomes part of Earth's core.
From the article I posted for you, which you cherry-picked a hypothesized scenario the same article told you was impossible to be sure of:
(June 14, 2014 at 12:24 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:(June 13, 2014 at 11:43 pm)snowtracks Wrote: majority theory: cores merged, around 2 minutes on video. but nice try though. http://www.history.com/shows/the-univers...f-the-moon
Clearly, the History Channel is well known for researching claims made on its programs, and only providing the best scientifically accurate documentaries.
Quote:Testing the Giant Impact Hypothesis
The initial temperatures of the Earth and Moon, the chemical compositions of their mantles, and the time when their cores formed in principle can be used to test the giant impact hypothesis. Unfortunately, planet formation and the subsequent formation of crusts, mantles, and cores is so complicated that much of the evidence may be destroyed. Furthermore, we do not yet have sufficient data to test all the possibilities.
In fact, we do not know if Earth's lower mantle has the same composition as the upper mantle today.
The First Few Hundred Million Years of the Earth
Although not proven to everyone's satisfaction, the giant impact hypothesis explains a lot about the Earth and Moon. Combined with our current understanding of accretion, it leads to a dynamic and somewhat terrifying picture of the first few hundred million years for both bodies.
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/scitech/disp...?ST_ID=446
