(June 17, 2014 at 12:07 am)psychoslice Wrote:(June 16, 2014 at 4:34 am)Stimbo Wrote: Ok psychoslice, I want to play a game.
You've already stated that the Moon landing didn't happen because you think it was too easy. I don't know if you're dismissing all six manned landings, or just Apollo 11, or even if you're including all Moon missions including the Russian ones. But I digress.
I and others have presented cases for what would have made the alternative scenario, ie filmed on a studio set, not only too difficult but actually impossible. So my question to you is: given that we have footage of astronauts on the lunar surface, coupled with the recent orbital pictures from the Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter (LRO), one of which I shared earlier, and given the physical impossibilities surrounding mounting the missions anywhere but on the Moon, how do you think it was achieved? It's not enough simply to say “it never happened; it wa too easy“.
Real or fake - make your case.
Yes I was talking about the first landing, you may be right or wrong, I don't really know, but my gut feeling keeps telling me it just didn't happen, and that's all it is, its just my own opinion, but I will not be spoken to by idiots here who don't agree with me in the way they have.
Even a "gut feeling" can have a reason behind it - however small. Stimbo was asking you to present your case so that he/we may offer you the consideration you feel you deserve. To clarify my point: theists have a "gut feeling" and you see how they are treated.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/517dc/517dc3eeb5b4a7c02c887d87dc280ed9654c8409" alt="Undecided Undecided"
![[Image: StimboKnows_zpsa8dfdc55.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk619%2Fjcincain%2FArt%2520Vault%2FStimboKnows_zpsa8dfdc55.jpg)