Evidence God Exists: Part II

[AngelThMan]

...a lack of evidence for abiogenesis simply means that we (those who study these things) have yet to make that all important discovery. After all, we have only been investigating the matter for a few centuries which, considering the mammoth task and the vast timescales involved, is not a terribly long period of time...

500 years is enough time. Most experiments would be deemed failures after a fraction of that time. But scientist, particularly atheist scientists, will continue to try to prove abiogenesis for a million years. Anything but consider the possibility that life was originated by God.

...the question of abiogenesis, how living things originally arose from non-living material, remains relevant today.

The first form is abiogenesis, in which life emerges from non-living matter. This should not be confused for the modern hypothesis of abiogenesis, in which life emerged once and diversified...

This is a perfect example of trying to make a shoe fit without a shoehorn. 500 years of experiments trying to prove abiogenesis failed, so let's modify the concept to keep the theory alive. In a way, this is an apologetic standard (staple atheist terminology).

Atheists are so quick to support, and even staunchly believe in, the hypothesis of abiogenesis, which is based on unfounded theories, and yet attack theists for believing in a deity who supposedly lacks evidence.