Evidence God Exists: Part II

[tavarish]

This is a perfect example of trying to make a shoe fit without a shoehorn. 500 years of experiments trying to prove abiogenesis failed, so let's modify the concept to keep the theory alive. In a way, this is an apologetic standard (staple atheist terminology).

LOL @ keep the theory alive. I love when people like you get on their soapbox to allude to some kind of conspiracy against God. We'll do anything but believe! Oh noes!

Atheists are so quick to support, and even staunchly believe in, the hypothesis of abiogenesis, which is based on unfounded theories, and yet attack theists for believing in a deity who supposedly lacks evidence.

1. Do you know the theories and experiments behind abiogenesis? I'm guessing not.
2. Your deity does lack evidence, and so does abiogenesis, that's why I don't "believe" in either. However, abiogenesis is a theory that is falsifiable, something your God isn't, so it lends credence to the theory in some respect. It can be proven wrong, however it hasn't yet.

I suspect you have a skewed view of how science actually operates. A few centuries without a certain discovery of a concept doesn't mean that concept is false. There's no statute of limitations on theories.