(May 6, 2010 at 10:16 pm)Watson Wrote: There are ways in which those scientists could stumble upon or come into the concept of a God, but none that would "conform to their scientific ways of thinking." If they aren't willing to observe and examine evidence outside of that way of thinking, well, they aren't very good scientists, now are they?Science has never been unwilling to observe or consider claims of gods. There is simply nothing to observe, no indicators saying it needs further consideration, nothing indicating that gods are anything other than an emotionally charged concept. You speak of evidence outside science, but that doesn't make sense, since evidence is by definition acceptable to science, without needing to conform to anything other than being evidence. Where is the evidence? Thinking about a concept or idea does not make it real. At most you will only fool yourself into faith-'believing'. Others might ask you for some proof of these wacky claims, and it's pretty obvious why.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2024, 2:04 am
Thread Rating:
Evidence God Exists: Part II
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)