RE: No True Scotsman
June 22, 2014 at 4:51 am
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2014 at 5:01 am by rexbeccarox.)
ITT: Lek defends the No True Scotsman with the No True Scotsman. Makes sense; he's used to circular reasoning.
*yawn*
I was hoping for something more interesting here. Yeah... I'm probably delusional.
ETA: When I was looking for something more interesting, I was talking about the lek's arguments. The responses in this thread have been great.
*yawn*
I was hoping for something more interesting here. Yeah... I'm probably delusional.
ETA: When I was looking for something more interesting, I was talking about the lek's arguments. The responses in this thread have been great.