RE: Evidence God Exists: Part II
May 9, 2010 at 12:25 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2010 at 12:27 pm by Samson.)
(May 9, 2010 at 1:17 am)padraic Wrote:Quote:Shouldn't that be combined together, "Orangutan"....
Well,yes and no. That's how it's written in English. However,the word is actually composed off two Malay/Indonesian words 'orang' (man) and (h)utan (forest) It's usually translated as ' man of the forest' which is how I always think of them,having lived in Malaysia and seen them in the wild*
Probably an unfair analogy;Orangs are beautiful and intelligent creatures and can be taught. This does not apply to most apologists ,who argue from a position of personal certitude,unable/ unwilling to entertain the possibility of error.. ..
*by 'them' I mean two, once,40 odd years ago in deep jungle on army patrol..
Thanks for the Breakdown....And I agree on this part by far..lol.."Probably an unfair analogy;Orangs are beautiful and intelligent creatures and can be taught. This does not apply to most apologists ,who argue from a position of personal certitude,unable/ unwilling to entertain the possibility of error.. ..
Quote:Maybe Adrian is a gentleman and can argue a point intelligently and politely even with someone who disagrees with him, and not like the two of you, who can only behave like orangutans.
Please tell me how I have behaved in such a way....To you....
I asked you a few simple questions, and you never responded....Not that I'm loosing sleep over it, but after reading your posts for the past 15 pages, a person can get a pretty clear idea of where someones head is or is not....
Intelligence is the only true moral guide...