Evidence God Does Not Exist

[fr0d0]

Nothing in science is proven or disproven beyond a shadow of any possible doubt. In science, everything is provisional. Being provisional is not a weakness or a sign that a conclusion is weak. Being provisional is a smart, pragmatic tactic because we can never be sure what we'll come across when we round the next corner. This lack of absolute certainty is a window through which many religious theists try to slip their god, but that's not a valid move.

Correction... Christian Scientists or the Scientific Religious. Purist theologians don't conflate theology and science. You FAIL!

To consider the problem scientifically, you would conclude that a non-temporal entity could have no empirical evidence... so any scientist researching such nonsense should be escorted to the nearest funny farm. IMHO.