Evidence God Does Not Exist

[fr0d0]

The evidence points to wholly natural explanations and indicates that god is not necessary. It doesn't prove such, but it does indicate it. It is not about theological questions, it is about the answers to 'why' and 'how'. None of the evidence indicates those answers to be 'god'. To me (and many other atheists) this supports our conclusion that there is no god. All conclusions are subject to revision if and when evidence to the contrary arises. Saying that, in spite of the lack of evidence, god is the answer, is simply not a rational conclusion... since there is no evidence to support it.

Didn't you just fall into the trap of scientist trying to prove the transcendental?

Your obsession with a provable God is not a theological one, and therefore irrelevant.

For the concept of God to work his existence has to be unknowable.

That's convenient.

But poignant.