RE: What is a person?
May 13, 2010 at 10:24 am
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2010 at 10:25 am by tackattack.)
(May 13, 2010 at 9:49 am)Saerules Wrote:
well you do have your own intrinsic value inate to yourself. But as I said before, when talking about worth within society or from the extranious perspective, another similar entity would be a necessity/
#1: "A person must have a place on the space time continuum."
^ This one is good.
Quote:
Ok we'll reword it then to Must have an intent to it's existence (not necessarily including only conscious intent or precluding a consciousness)
#2: "Must have mannerisms."
^ This one is good. I suppose that without mannerisms, an thing could hardly have a personality, and with no personality: how would a thing be a person? (rhetorical)
go to bed then, lol. There's no time limit to the pursuit of understanding
Quote:
Then we'll include being human as part of the definition of being a person
Quote:
I think we attribute value to them and thus attempt to give them characteristics we define as part of being a person (like ai's with manerisms and androids shaped like humans, mimmicking human triats) But I don't think it intrinsically make them a person because they don't fit the definition of a person. They can righlty be humanoid.. human like.. but I don't know where this would go if we through clones into the mix.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari