(July 8, 2014 at 7:46 am)Cato Wrote: Let me get this straight....
The Speaker of the House wants to sue the President for use of executive orders, not an illegal activity, to execute laws that are unmanageable as written because of changing conditions. Seems the Speaker could just do his job and coordinate House work to enact meaningful and enforceable legislation.
Keep in mind this is the same person that said that immigration reform won't be touched until after midterm elections. What the fuck is wrong here? The Speaker wants to sue the President for not doing his job, which is aggravated by the Speaker not doing his for the sake of garnering votes.
The system has failed.
The system failed the second right wingers didn't get their way and became traitors to their own country and people.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
