Evidence God Exists: Part II

[Welsh cake]

This was meant to be more of an expression, semi-slogan, if you will, for my OP. But a lot of you took it too literally, as a lot of replies were built around the premise that "lack of evidence is not evidence." I just wanted to point out that it is not lack of evidence that I am presenting as evidence, but the results of 500 years of failed experiments. That's what my evidence is for God's existence. 500 years of scientific experiments have demonstrated that life cannot be created from inanimate matter.

No. You are a broken record Angel. When we said, go back and try again, we meant, GO BACK AND TRY AGAIN. Have you not even bothered to read everyone's responses? You have a mental block that is preventing you from understanding that attempting to refute or disprove abiogenesis (which I maybe willing to accept if only for the sake of your argument's premise) does not then automatically give you any grounds to follow up a claim regarding an infinite cosmos creator's existence. You can't have your cake and eat it.

@Thor and Caecilian: You can't equate a couple of inventions, or the development of technology to the origin of life. Let's at least find a concept that's analogous to the theory that life can appear out of thin air.

Are you talking about cognitive science or contemporary philosophy? Concepts don't actually exist or manifest in reality, they're mental representations or rather, abstract ideas.

Right. That's why atheists spend half their time posting attacks and insults, often obscene, directed at God or Jesus. If they were open to the possibility that God exists, they wouldn't commit the unforgivable sin of blasphemy.

Usually we're directing our criticisms at your half-baked hypothesises, because atheists don't actually believe in the evidence-free God you are trying to assert.

What I find sad is how oblivious you are to Atheist Forums' banner which clearly states: "BLASPHEMY IS A VICTIMLESS CRIME".