A particularly annoying exchange: Apparently the Christian God now includes a...
July 22, 2014 at 4:22 am
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2014 at 4:26 am by Rampant.A.I..)
That's part of my point and annoyance. Stating the believer would likely presuppose a different God based on where they'd been born was, in my opinion, the entire point of Dawkins' tweet.
The believer immediately goes on the defensive, because Dawkins, adds in "therefore your belief is wrong," fabricating a genetic fallacy that didn't exist in the original tweet.
Anyway, I'm reasonably sure it's "because Jesus," which is a clear indicator the truth of Christianity is simply presupposed, and these are apologetic backflips to justify Christianity being chosen in the first place.
Endless loop, back to "well; what criteria did you use to determine that?"
The believer immediately goes on the defensive, because Dawkins, adds in "therefore your belief is wrong," fabricating a genetic fallacy that didn't exist in the original tweet.
Anyway, I'm reasonably sure it's "because Jesus," which is a clear indicator the truth of Christianity is simply presupposed, and these are apologetic backflips to justify Christianity being chosen in the first place.
Endless loop, back to "well; what criteria did you use to determine that?"
