The problem here is that you are not even talking about evolution- evolution, as has been said before many different places, is only the fact that organisms change throughout time. This fact is well documented by the fossil record, and by genetic testing, and is fact. The theory of evolution, which I assume you also disagree with, is a well-established one which explains how exactly these changes come to happen. What you disagree with, here, is the idea of abiogenesis.
Consider for a moment the idea that the first replicating molecule may not have been living. Have you heard of prions? These are self-replicating proteins. NOT even RNA or DNA here, I'm talking proteins. If the first "thing" which began self-replication was merely a string of, say for simplicity's sake, amino acids, then it would need neither metabolism nor waste management.
Original ideas, please.
Consider for a moment the idea that the first replicating molecule may not have been living. Have you heard of prions? These are self-replicating proteins. NOT even RNA or DNA here, I'm talking proteins. If the first "thing" which began self-replication was merely a string of, say for simplicity's sake, amino acids, then it would need neither metabolism nor waste management.
Original ideas, please.
