Quote:if it were done, would still prove nothing about God except that it is in fact possible to create life from scratch in the first place. It lends more to God than against Him.
So if it was done and proves that life can start without the need of a god, this then some how supports your god belief? Huh? Where is the logic in that?
If anything it leans away from god.
If life can start on it's own without the need for a creater, then this proves that god was never needed to create life. It leans away from god not towards it.
Same thing for the universe. If it can start on it's own naturally without the need for a god, then why believe a god was behind it? The whole thing leans away from the god conclusion, making the god claim even less credible (then again you can't really lose more credibility if you already have none).
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
