(July 29, 2014 at 8:08 am)alpha male Wrote:What Chad said. Also, the volunteer can't decide what level of disclosure is adequate because they haven't been given all the information. Either way, there's force or manipulation. Contract lawyers would be dancing a jig of glee!(July 29, 2014 at 7:52 am)Ben Davis Wrote: No, the premise of the OP is that having parts of one's personality forcibly changed by an outside agent, either against one's will or without full disclosure of the impacts of the changes, is necessarily bad.In this case it's voluntary, not forcible, and I'd say it's up to the volunteer to decide what level of disclosure is adequate.
Sum ergo sum