RE: Destroying the theory of evolution in one post
December 21, 2008 at 7:34 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2008 at 7:41 pm by bozo.)
(December 21, 2008 at 5:59 pm)lilphil1989 Wrote:(December 21, 2008 at 4:55 pm)CoxRox Wrote: I'll accept that these 'changes' or adaptations are part of what is believed to be the evolutionary process.
They are not part of it. They ARE it. Really that's it. The theory of evolution is wonderful in it's simplicity.
Just out of interest, what's your position on evolution?
CR's desire is that " god " created everything. She has expressed this wish in previous posts.
(December 21, 2008 at 12:45 am)bodhitharta Wrote: The first living organism would have had to be able to have the following functions in order for evolution to occur:
Metabolism
Waste management
Replication/reproduction capacity/capability
If these three functions were met at the onset of life they could not have evolved to get to this point.
What does a Progressive revelationlist mean please?
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
