(August 11, 2014 at 5:27 am)pocaracas Wrote:ok, that was an over-generalization... my bad.(August 11, 2014 at 5:10 am)Michael Wrote: Pocaracas. You won't give me the satisfaction of backing up your accusation of dishonesty? Well, I have no interest in, and no respect for, ad hom argumentation and those that pursue it. I shall leave it there.EVERY THEIST EVER: you guys only read the first sentence.
Statler Waldorf addresses every single point in a post, often leading to half an hour, or more, of me addressing his posts back.
Who else?.... hmmmm... can't think of any...
Anyway, Michael, if you had bothered to read past the first sentence, you would have seen I never did any ad hom argumentation.
An Ad hom is when I dismiss your argument, based on my perception of your persona. What I did was ask how can you live with the intellectual dishonesty which should arise from bridging your scientific self from your believer self.
But you're not going to read this... it's too far down the post... nvm