(August 13, 2014 at 2:32 pm)Drich Wrote:(August 13, 2014 at 12:03 pm)oukoida Wrote: By asking him, one should presuppose his existence. By seeking him, the only evidence one would have would be in their own mind. Such "evidence", consisting of actions supposedly operated by god for the good of the seeker, could not be confirmed by another observer (who could dismiss it as coincidences or as products of the seeker's good will and ability), thus would not be objective.
the same could be said about one person true feelings of loving another. Just because Love cant always be objectified does it too ceases to exist?
Love is not an entity.
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
