RE: Q. About Rationality and Nature
August 14, 2014 at 1:41 pm
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2014 at 1:45 pm by Mudhammam.)
(August 14, 2014 at 12:15 pm)whateverist Wrote:(August 14, 2014 at 4:21 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Yes, I suppose that is what I mean, though to clarify, I suppose my question pertains to whether or not it is possible to have an empirical existence, in Time and Space, without a priori pure reason, which seems inextricably interwoven with the most basic categories of existence/non-existence, unity/divisibility, finite/infinite, etc.
It isn't the existence of whatever it is that gives rise to our sense data which depends on pure reason, just us.
Go on... I think I agree but can you spell it out a little more?
Also, as a side, it is kind of remarkable to read what Kant argues as his conception of God on the basis of pure logic and what modern cosmology has dubbed the Singularity.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza