GIA said:
(Yesterday 19:56)Diablo Wrote: It's amazing that this thread has lasted 122 posts. Which part of 'no' don't you understand, the 'n' or the 'o'?
I agree.
But if man is going to continue denying women equality, and men will continue to rule, who should they rule for? Themselves?
You can say for the whole of society and would be partially correct but how is society structured and when push comes to shove, will men step up to protect families or will they try to get the weaker family members to protect their stronger asses?
The ancient Kings ruled for their Queens. They recognized their family responsibilities and duty and pride in doing that duty. To say that the King will sit at home and send the Queen to do his fighting seems rather cowardly to me. Not to you I take it?
Regards
DL
What a load of utter nonsense!
Man is NOT going to continue denying women equality, and men will NOT continue to rule. We've had Thatcher and Merkel, and a Queen on the throne, in case you didn't notice.
Men do not step up to protect families, that's why we have police and a CJS, who often have to protect families from their menfolk. You ever heard of domestic violence?
We've had 3 queens who were actually rather successful, Lizzy 1 & 2, and Victoria, who presided over the biggest empire of all time.
Just what planet are you from, buddy?
Listen, women have full equality before the law and in society, there are more females in the professions in the US than males, and they can do without people like you.
(Yesterday 19:56)Diablo Wrote: It's amazing that this thread has lasted 122 posts. Which part of 'no' don't you understand, the 'n' or the 'o'?
I agree.
But if man is going to continue denying women equality, and men will continue to rule, who should they rule for? Themselves?
You can say for the whole of society and would be partially correct but how is society structured and when push comes to shove, will men step up to protect families or will they try to get the weaker family members to protect their stronger asses?
The ancient Kings ruled for their Queens. They recognized their family responsibilities and duty and pride in doing that duty. To say that the King will sit at home and send the Queen to do his fighting seems rather cowardly to me. Not to you I take it?
Regards
DL
What a load of utter nonsense!
Man is NOT going to continue denying women equality, and men will NOT continue to rule. We've had Thatcher and Merkel, and a Queen on the throne, in case you didn't notice.
Men do not step up to protect families, that's why we have police and a CJS, who often have to protect families from their menfolk. You ever heard of domestic violence?
We've had 3 queens who were actually rather successful, Lizzy 1 & 2, and Victoria, who presided over the biggest empire of all time.
Just what planet are you from, buddy?
Listen, women have full equality before the law and in society, there are more females in the professions in the US than males, and they can do without people like you.
