RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
August 27, 2014 at 5:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2014 at 5:04 pm by Mystical.)
(August 27, 2014 at 10:36 am)Greatest I am Wrote:(August 26, 2014 at 7:18 am)LostLocke Wrote: Neither.
That explains you not knowing your duty.
Regards
DL
Your little happy family unit trope is not in alignment with reality. Before you go telling others what their duties are, perhaps you should first examine where you fit, in the scheme of things. And I mean in this world in this life, with real people who certainly are able to live quite well, without your garbage emotional baggage and blackmail. Duty to oneself, reign supreme. Or did you not know this?
My duty to myself encompasses all those interrelationship bonds, and don't need guidelines of heirarchy. For instance, your duty to yourself is to be happy healthy and content. To be happy, one must find balance with those they love.
Widows
Single parents
GLBT
Adoption
All of these are real life examples of.. REAL LIFE. You can't account for it because you at stuck in a little box, and cannot see how miniscule you really are in the grand scheme of things.
There are two men that I know, who have the same opinion as you do about womenly duties. They're utterly and completely alone, bitter and hateful individuals. They are so full of themselves, shit just flies everywhere out of their mouths and elsewhere.
For your sake, I hope you can get over the supremacy you have allocated yourself, so you may fully enjoy life, and the relationships therein.
As a woman, Esquilaxs woman to be exact-- I choose to whom I submit my entire being, mind body, and heart. I would rather die, than give myself to a pig who points to a book and tells me I'm his subservient.
Esquilax will receive every natural gift a woman has to offer, willingly, from me, because he earned it. Because he is a man deserving of eVerything that I can have the privelage of providing him. And thankfully he and I are progressive enough to recognize that both our viewpoints equally matter, so the resolution will be equally agreed upon. Sometimes I will submit to his best judgement, and he to mine, but no one Owns supreme position over the other.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)