RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
August 28, 2014 at 1:55 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2014 at 1:56 pm by Tartarus Sauce.)
(August 28, 2014 at 12:23 pm)Losty Wrote:my duty to my children is because I created them and they are helpless without me.
A man has no inherent duty to serve his wife. If he wants to and he chooses to and she likes it then cool. But he doesn't have to and if he doesn't want to then that doesn't make him less of a man.
(August 28, 2014 at 12:41 pm)Greatest I am Wrote:(August 28, 2014 at 12:23 pm)Losty Wrote:
A man has no inherent duty to serve his wife. If he wants to and he chooses to and she likes it then cool. But he doesn't have to and if he doesn't want to then that doesn't make him less of a man.
Yes it does. Just like you not doing your duty to him would make you less of a woman.
Regards
DL
I just stumbled into this thread, but I don't think any claim could be made about an obligation to duties unless those duties are defined. I'm sure that's already been gone over though, could anybody give me a brief synopsis (or has it not in fact been covered yet)?
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
