(August 28, 2014 at 3:42 pm)Tonus Wrote: Oppressive censorship is always easiest to implement against the unpopular and seemingly most deserving members of society. Once they're out of the way, the censors find themselves with a lot of power and few people to exercise it against. So they start expanding the meaning of "stupid."
Always the slippery slope no? However, surely there is a balance I mean look at the South man....it is turning into a dystopia, as minimalist stated. The whole game changes once the idiots get elected. Free speech (unchained) is made for an educated population. With out that, then you give the freedom for people to be well destructive against others.
![[Image: grumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_GaCN-f8ZFo%2FUNfmimTyf4I%2FAAAAAAAANmk%2FoakT_wL319U%2Fs1600%2Fgrumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg)
I would be a televangelist....but I have too much of a soul.