(August 30, 2014 at 7:28 pm)Natachan Wrote: You have been told how acceleration due to gravity is calculated both theoretically through formulas and practically through direct observation and repeatable verifiable falsifiable experimentation. This is not faith. You have yet to provide the same sort of thing for your god. Your trying to say it is comes off as very silly.
As to wiki, meh. For that subject it's rather dumbed down. If you think it's a good enough explanation of gravity fine, but those people who work with planes and rockets might find it slightly silly.
My company actually works (r&d and as a subcontractor with various sub assemblies) with companies who have equipment in atmo, orbit and even on Mars. I am very familiar with the level of work expected and what is provided.. That is why I provide proof and ask for proof, each and every time something questionable is being discussed.
Because when dealing with precession equipment or when in development/exploring a new concept based on known principles, those principles all must be proofed and accounted for before the new principle can be considered. Again that is why I automatically provide these proofs, and why I have asked the same from you.
Not one of you has answered this challenge. Therefore I determined no other source material outside of wiki is needed.
(Meaning it is very apparent the information needed to be 'dumbed down' as much as possible otherwise their would be no hope of establishing my point.)
