RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
August 31, 2014 at 3:41 pm
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2014 at 3:49 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Another basis of fine tune argument is supposition that the so called tuning parameters really not only can be different in some principle, but can in some principle assume a range of values that is very wide compared to the range under which life may arise. This principle is unfortunately nonexistent, and is nothing but an argument from ignorance. We know not why the constants have these values and what limits there are on the range of values they can take, therefore we based an entire world view on the supposition that they can take on any arbitrary value and their actual value in our universe is therefore statistically unlikely.
This is in turn based on the supposition that there is no deeper, more fundamental principles of nature which constricts the range of, or even determines the exact values these parameters can take, and these constants therefore behave like some quantum probability curve. But there may very well be. Physics may yet reveal there are deeper layers of operations behind apparent reality which actually limits the possible values of these so called tuning parameter to a narrow range of values, to a limited set of discreet values, or to just a single value each.
Where would the tuning hand of the all powerful god be then if all of what we currently think of as free spinning dials turnout to be by nature fixed and unsusceptible to any input? Would fime tuners then admit there is no god should physics go on to demonstrate constants of nature are what they are for a reason other than their purposed tuning from a range of possible value by an intelligent creator?
I don't think so. It is the nature of wish thinker to grab onto any apparent support as probe positive of their proposition. But if the support should collapse, they would never admit to the opposite implication.
This is in turn based on the supposition that there is no deeper, more fundamental principles of nature which constricts the range of, or even determines the exact values these parameters can take, and these constants therefore behave like some quantum probability curve. But there may very well be. Physics may yet reveal there are deeper layers of operations behind apparent reality which actually limits the possible values of these so called tuning parameter to a narrow range of values, to a limited set of discreet values, or to just a single value each.
Where would the tuning hand of the all powerful god be then if all of what we currently think of as free spinning dials turnout to be by nature fixed and unsusceptible to any input? Would fime tuners then admit there is no god should physics go on to demonstrate constants of nature are what they are for a reason other than their purposed tuning from a range of possible value by an intelligent creator?
I don't think so. It is the nature of wish thinker to grab onto any apparent support as probe positive of their proposition. But if the support should collapse, they would never admit to the opposite implication.