I didn't say she asked a question... I suggested you answer her argument I see plenty of argument to answer here
How would a difference in the brain change what clothes they should wear on their bodies? Also, it should be noted that whilst these differences in brain might hold true for the most part, they do not necessarily define all of each sex Further, one might note that what differences there are in the brains of men and women are largely due to what the society of humans value in male and female humans (and thusly: helped them carry on their genes). In other words: one would (given enough time) find entirely different results in a matriarchal society of humans... and similarly: other species' male and female thought patterns would reflect the attributes that helped them reproduce.
Also... I think that
Is utterly ridiculous. Just where in our evolutionary chain would maps have entered into it so as to make those men able to read maps more capable of reproduction, or more likely to carry on their genes? Also mo3... please not that these are tendencies, not certainties for male and female humans Ultimately, the differences in male and female human brains is no more significant than the differences between the brain of a male human and another one, and likewise of female humans.
I should have you know: I am a vehement opponent of equality... but I simply can't see any of this as being even remotely significant past slight biological interest... and is hardly enough of a change so as to make one person wear different clothes than another. If you don't clothe people differently because of a difference in the body or brain... then by what do you judge them to wear different clothes?
mo3taz3bar Wrote:thats what am talking about http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/sc...175612.ece
not the difference in body
How would a difference in the brain change what clothes they should wear on their bodies? Also, it should be noted that whilst these differences in brain might hold true for the most part, they do not necessarily define all of each sex Further, one might note that what differences there are in the brains of men and women are largely due to what the society of humans value in male and female humans (and thusly: helped them carry on their genes). In other words: one would (given enough time) find entirely different results in a matriarchal society of humans... and similarly: other species' male and female thought patterns would reflect the attributes that helped them reproduce.
Also... I think that
Article posted by Mo3 Wrote:While there are no sex differences in general intelligence, women tend to have stronger visual memories, while men are more proficient at visualising objects when rotated in space. It has been suggested that this may reflect the way most men like to navigate by reading maps, while many women prefer to remember landmarks
Is utterly ridiculous. Just where in our evolutionary chain would maps have entered into it so as to make those men able to read maps more capable of reproduction, or more likely to carry on their genes? Also mo3... please not that these are tendencies, not certainties for male and female humans Ultimately, the differences in male and female human brains is no more significant than the differences between the brain of a male human and another one, and likewise of female humans.
I should have you know: I am a vehement opponent of equality... but I simply can't see any of this as being even remotely significant past slight biological interest... and is hardly enough of a change so as to make one person wear different clothes than another. If you don't clothe people differently because of a difference in the body or brain... then by what do you judge them to wear different clothes?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day