(September 6, 2014 at 5:48 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: war in self defense
The sticky part is what constitutes "self defense" when dealing with the sensibilities of Islamo-Christians.
It's important to remember that, to them, the mere existence of a non-believer is deeply offensive. There is no way to accommodate their sensibilities. A simple statement of "I don't agree" or "I don't share your views" or "on what evidence do you base any of these beliefs on" are enough to trigger rage.
Islamo-Christianity can't live peacefully with non-believers. These religions want everyone on their knees or in the ground. At best, we might be spared if we agree to remain firmly in the closet.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
