RE: Supervenience, Transcendence, and Mind
September 7, 2014 at 7:10 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2014 at 7:10 pm by bennyboy.)
(September 7, 2014 at 4:10 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I finally found my way to this thread of yours!
And.... what can I say... when you redefine transcendence in that way, then yes... but don't expect me to apply the same agreement if you start using the common definition of transcendence:
Quote:adjective
1. going beyond ordinary limits; surpassing; exceeding.
2. superior or supreme.
3. Theology. (of the Deity) transcending the universe, time, etc.
4. Philosophy.
Scholasticism. above all possible modes of the infinite.
Kantianism. transcending experience; not realizable in human experience.
(in modern realism) referred to, but beyond, direct apprehension; outside consciousness.
Tell you what... how about you come up with a different word, instead of "transcendent"?
The point is that the property has in a sense escaped the bounds of the mechanism on which it supervenes. The property has its own identity, despite supposing to be rooted in that mechanism.
(September 7, 2014 at 7:06 pm)rasetsu Wrote: I think you're one of those people who likes to make up his own definitions for words.Nope. I'm using that word because I know what it usually means, and that's the meaning I want.