God vs Big Bang- Are either correct?

[sswhateverlove]

We can know for sure with a lot more "sure" of the right type than the idiotic incorrectable certainty that gave us drivel like genesis.

Nothing is sure, but every is more or less sure. With science we are more sure about things we have good grounds to be more sure about. With religion we are absolutely sure about things which as as unsure as anything can get.

I agree. I am not arguing a religious perspective.

---

"Results" in science imply correlation, not causation. Often causation is assumed with these results which is not accurate unless all other variables are controlled for. Unknown variables could very well be involved with causation of our perceived correlations. We cannot know for sure.

No. Results can imply causation. And what percent confindence would you justify "know for sure"? I meantion earlier. 100% is impossible.

Most scientists would disagree with you. That's why their assertions are called "theories".
http://www.stats.org/faq_vs.htm

---

Ok, I appreciate your clarification. It is not claimed that it started as nothing, from what you posted I now understand it is believed to have started as something extremely small that existed in it's smallness for all the time prior to the bang and then just "banged" with no cause. Am I correct now?

Still no. What did your university physics professor tell you about the properties and origin of "time?"

Here's a really good documentary that a physics mentor actually sent to me a few months ago. Reputable source. Nicely done.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BjGWLJNPcA