Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 2, 2026, 3:21 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
(September 14, 2014 at 2:39 pm)ShaMan Wrote:
(September 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: If I would have added 'or you will die' to the command to do jumping jacks, does that necessitate that you did them?
(September 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: To add 'free and unhampered' as qualifiers of choice is moving the goal posts.
The option is no longer do jumping jacks or do not do jumping jacks. The option changed from the former into... "Do the jumping jacks or die." It is your ilk who've moved the goalposts.

This is in defense to the assertion that a command does not necessitate the commanded response. If the command did necessitate the commanded response it wouldn't matter if there was a 'threat' attached to the command or not. In the same way, if the command does not necessitate the commanded response then a 'threat' attached to the command wouldn't necessitate the commanded response, it would only make it emotionally more difficult.
(September 14, 2014 at 2:39 pm)ShaMan Wrote:
(September 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: If I were to say to you, don't stick a fork in that wall outlet [a command] or you will die [a threat]. Does that necessitate you wouldn't stick a fork in the wall outlet? No (unless you're ShaMan).
Is this an attempt at an insult, or are you alluding to the post where I claimed to have done the jumping jacks. If the former, then have your fun. If the latter, then please know that I realize that one is potentially lethal more so than the other. Of course the third option is that you're trolling Angel
I was referencing your joke from post #241
(September 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: When paul says 1 Timothy 2:12 NIV

I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet. He is not being sexist or anything like it. To understand you have to look at ths context. At the time Paul said this women were mostly illiterate and unlearned, Paul is saying that women can only be allowed to teach if the are taught first. Also why would Paul teach women tp pray and prophesy in church(1 Corithians 11:5) if he meant them to be silent. Paul also critises men at the time for keeping women from an education. Furthermore in Ephesus were Timothy taught, there was a pagan cult worshipping the pagan God Artemis. This worship was lead by priestesses, this is also what Paul refers to when he says women should be silent.
While I agree there are times that commands are contingent upon cultural differences, Paul specifically connects the reason for why a woman is not to teach a man to the created order, not to a cultural one. The context here is 'because Adam was first created and then Eve,' and not 'because they were uneducated.'

If it could be proven beyond doubt that God exists...
and that He is the one spoken of in the Bible...
would you repent of your sins and place your faith in Jesus Christ?



Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good? - by orangebox21 - September 14, 2014 at 3:29 pm
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good? - by Chas - September 15, 2014 at 10:31 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Twelve religious group members arrested over Australian girl's death zebo-the-fat 2 1496 July 6, 2022 at 2:40 am
Last Post: Jackie
  Man claims to hunt non-binaries Ferrocyanide 10 3037 April 6, 2022 at 8:47 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Religious groups in UK failing children over sex abuse zebo-the-fat 1 1904 September 2, 2021 at 6:29 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Was the condemnation of man justified? Greatest I am 54 14780 January 25, 2021 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  Friggin' religious dudes, man - obsessed with policing the Vag. Figbash 1 1195 June 7, 2019 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  7 Pious Xtian Shits Who Stepped On Their Own Dicks Minimalist 0 1383 October 12, 2018 at 12:57 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Too Late Fucktards. You Own Him Now. Minimalist 10 3287 October 10, 2018 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: Jackie
  How the black man embraced Christianity Paraselene 48 18838 July 10, 2018 at 5:53 am
Last Post: Amarok
  Could I sue my religion over this? Won2blv 21 7026 October 8, 2017 at 8:18 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Pope Takes A Crack At Fucking Over The WLB Minimalist 29 9582 August 5, 2017 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)