Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 8:06 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
(September 14, 2014 at 2:39 pm)ShaMan Wrote:
(September 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: If I would have added 'or you will die' to the command to do jumping jacks, does that necessitate that you did them?
(September 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: To add 'free and unhampered' as qualifiers of choice is moving the goal posts.
The option is no longer do jumping jacks or do not do jumping jacks. The option changed from the former into... "Do the jumping jacks or die." It is your ilk who've moved the goalposts.

This is in defense to the assertion that a command does not necessitate the commanded response. If the command did necessitate the commanded response it wouldn't matter if there was a 'threat' attached to the command or not. In the same way, if the command does not necessitate the commanded response then a 'threat' attached to the command wouldn't necessitate the commanded response, it would only make it emotionally more difficult.
(September 14, 2014 at 2:39 pm)ShaMan Wrote:
(September 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: If I were to say to you, don't stick a fork in that wall outlet [a command] or you will die [a threat]. Does that necessitate you wouldn't stick a fork in the wall outlet? No (unless you're ShaMan).
Is this an attempt at an insult, or are you alluding to the post where I claimed to have done the jumping jacks. If the former, then have your fun. If the latter, then please know that I realize that one is potentially lethal more so than the other. Of course the third option is that you're trolling Angel
I was referencing your joke from post #241
(September 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: When paul says 1 Timothy 2:12 NIV

I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet. He is not being sexist or anything like it. To understand you have to look at ths context. At the time Paul said this women were mostly illiterate and unlearned, Paul is saying that women can only be allowed to teach if the are taught first. Also why would Paul teach women tp pray and prophesy in church(1 Corithians 11:5) if he meant them to be silent. Paul also critises men at the time for keeping women from an education. Furthermore in Ephesus were Timothy taught, there was a pagan cult worshipping the pagan God Artemis. This worship was lead by priestesses, this is also what Paul refers to when he says women should be silent.
While I agree there are times that commands are contingent upon cultural differences, Paul specifically connects the reason for why a woman is not to teach a man to the created order, not to a cultural one. The context here is 'because Adam was first created and then Eve,' and not 'because they were uneducated.'

If it could be proven beyond doubt that God exists...
and that He is the one spoken of in the Bible...
would you repent of your sins and place your faith in Jesus Christ?



Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good? - by orangebox21 - September 14, 2014 at 3:29 pm
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good? - by Chas - September 15, 2014 at 10:31 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  7 Pious Xtian Shits Who Stepped On Their Own Dicks Minimalist 0 954 October 12, 2018 at 12:57 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Too Late Fucktards. You Own Him Now. Minimalist 10 1820 October 10, 2018 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  What if Jesus died for his own sins? Nihilist Virus 32 6599 August 27, 2016 at 11:01 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Physical man VS Spiritual man Won2blv 33 7090 July 9, 2016 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  How to Prove Your Own Position without Trying Very Hard Randy Carson 59 13012 July 14, 2015 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Hannity gets served by an atheist... and his own stupidity Regina 73 13422 June 23, 2015 at 10:16 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Jimmy Carter leaves Southern Baptists to stew in their own sexism. Whateverist 28 6695 April 24, 2015 at 12:56 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Theists protect their own egos. Brian37 9 2741 November 14, 2014 at 4:07 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Atheist protect their own eggo's Drich 8 1591 November 14, 2014 at 12:02 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Christian bigots sell out their own moral commandments in order to preach to gays. Esquilax 22 5682 July 13, 2014 at 7:23 am
Last Post: John V



Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)