RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 1:15 pm
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2014 at 1:16 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(September 15, 2014 at 1:13 pm)C4RM5 Wrote:You don't seem to see the difference between "teaching" something and asserting something. The Bible can assert that God sent his son (which was also himself) to die on the cross, but it provides no evidence, no proof, no way of investigating it. This is not "teaching", this is bald, flat assertion.(September 15, 2014 at 1:08 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Many, many Christians would disagree with you, and point to the same book for evidence. How do you determine who is right, if your book supposedly has the clear answer spelled out? And if it's not clearly spelled out, why not? If a god-inspired book wanted to pass down wisdom, surely God could've constructed it in a much, much clearer way.I guess God does everything for a reason and I am not in a position to question. Also I said others debate about it but I have never seen I Bible quote saying homosexuality was right. Finally to be Christian you have to believe God sent his son to die on the cross, that is not debatable among christians. Stating Jesus did not exist means you are not a Christian.
Also, "god does everything for a reason"? Seriously? That's some kindergarten theolgoy shit.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson