(June 17, 2010 at 1:50 am)AngelThMan Wrote: Here's the thing. God is in humanity's collective consciousness as the creator of life.Which one? And no, we're not talking about other creatures or examples of myth, there is more than one god-concept.
AngelThMan Wrote:Therefore, all experiments conducted in the area of life's origin have an underlying design to either prove or disprove God's existence.
All experiments conducted in the area of life's origin have no ulterior motive regarding deities, contrary to your half-baked half-arsed conspiracy theories.
AngelThMan Wrote:So whenever results fail to explain something scientifically, then it is not illogical to conclude that such results point towards the existence of God.Yes it is, because it's just one pathetic argument from ignorance.
(June 17, 2010 at 2:20 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: I did make the distinction in my post that there's an "underlying" objective to prove or disprove God. There's a difference between an 'underlying' objective and a main objective.
An ulterior motive IS THE SAME THING as an underlying objective.
AngelThMan Wrote:There's no real progress in the area of life's origin. Scientists have synthesized a single-cell genome, but that is completely different.There IS progress being made in the area of life's origin. That experiment was but one milestone.
Unlike you, scientists are out there accomplishing, achieving and discovering, the process won't stop just so you can have a security blanket to go to at night.